Categories
population health Public Health

Population health management redux. Volume 2

I said I’d never write on this again.

I tried to summarise what I’ve done across umpteen blogs into a single slide set. It is here

But have been persuaded to summarise further. Here goes (often ideas shamelessly nicked from others, I can’t recall who so apologies for the plagiarism where it happens)

1.      Core elements. For me the core elements are

use of data linkage -better understanding of risks and service use patterns

Build own capability or buy it in

ability to predictive model

How to segment / what structure. Population focused segments not service design focused.

Personally I’m a fan of a model built around Bridges to Health.

2.      design of service response to manage risk in segments. 

Decision needed on what / how to segment

Keep it simple and meaningful to the frontline.

3.      whole pop approach, clue in the title. POPULATION

not just those top 5%, and not those with disease x or in care of organisation y

all parties should consider where is the investment in primary care, focused investment around the practices with most deprived populations.

4). What might it look like every day

Steve Laitner summed it up recently….

Imagine everyone in a certain locality was working together and pooling resources and paid based on shared outcomes for the populations they served and not on activity through their services.

Incentives for preventing and delaying loss of health

We need that system to be able to

Data – Collect – the right info, including citizen generated data. (Big cultural change needed).Aggregate – that info, make it useable. Understand – Describe the need at neighbourhood level. Outcomes, map treatment pathways and monitor performance. Segment and risk stratify the population into groups

Care model Care management / Workflow optimisation / QA and monitoring

Operations  Process redesign / Payer risk contracting / Provider education and coaching / Top of licence staffing procedures / Reimbursement based on population value

 

 

5). Specific interventions

If I had to do specific interventions, I’d focus on MM  and systems for multi morbidity.

Target interventions :

Over diagnosis / treatment. Overall burden of treatment. Problem prioritisation, goal setting, and shared decision making

Person centered care & consultations. Training and competency at person level (patient oriented and clinician oriented) and systems designed to enable person centred as default.

geriatric assessments & personalised care planning.

 Exercise / muscle mass / CV fitness / frailty

poly pharmacy

falls prevention

 

Don’t be all medical model. Think in terms of how communities really operate, focus on asset based approaches to well being as well as “disease management”.

6). Clusters and prevention models focused on clusters of conditions

if I had to think about PHM in a preventive mindset it would be about clusters of multi morbidity

Thinking in a prevention frame…. not just primary prevention. The delay & prevent mindset.

what’s the most likely LTC to develop first – presumably diabetes. If you have diabetes what’s the next likely LTC you’ll get? – presumably CHD.

If you develop COPD first what’s the next thing you are going to get? – probably heart failure.

If you get CKD first … etc etc.

 

we all know what the risk factors for some of this stuff. Make sure we achieve good and equitable coverage of the right risk reduction / asset building interventions. Prof Bentley has written eloquently on this and given us a methodology.

7). What to focus on

I’ve heard a line that we will take a PHM approach to condition x,y, or z.

The clue is in the title – population, health, management. ALL three elements matter.

For me PHM should focus on populations not topics or diseases of interest

we needs to be careful we don’t end up dicing and slicing by diseases or groups of not pop and person focused risk segmenting

8). Other stuff

segmentation and Care models based around neighbourhoods. It, as a concept, MUST be owned by places and rooted there, not just around the NHS as an institution.

There’s an ask of the centre that one bit of NHS is relentlessly flogging RTT and 4 hr wait, DTOC etc…. which is inconsistent with PHM. Both together does not compute

 Thanks to Nigel Slone, Rupert Dunbar Rees, Steve Laitner, John Soady, Rupert Suckling and all others that I can’t recall stealing specific ideas from.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s